Can't decide what I think about this...
Oct. 25th, 2011 03:43 pmVegetarians, would you eat a steak if it had been grown in a lab, rather than as part of a sentient being?
Courtesy of
silenttex... BBC article about lab-grown meat here: Grow Your Own meat

Presumably, for a lot of non-meat-eaters, losing the farming/killing elements would solve the problem and get them back onto bacon butties... but it's hard to shake off the instinctive feeling of 'wrongness' about meat grown entirely in a lab.
Hmmm...
Courtesy of

Presumably, for a lot of non-meat-eaters, losing the farming/killing elements would solve the problem and get them back onto bacon butties... but it's hard to shake off the instinctive feeling of 'wrongness' about meat grown entirely in a lab.
Hmmm...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:03 pm (UTC)It depresses me how much kids and teenagers seem to love them.
I am actually dreading the day that Microboy's friends are old enough to start having Macdonalds parties...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:32 pm (UTC)That is, for example, McDonalds is "heavily processed" so that's bad whereas, say, a good quality malt whisky is "carefully aged" which is obviously different (although it's had a lot more and a lot more expensive processing).
Actually, the whole thing is quite weird. The hydroponics movement made "grown in a lab" seem appealing (at least to a certain type of person). If that kind of psychological magic could be worked then people would likely accept it.
If it could be packaged correctly for the "ooh it's natural it must be good" types then I think it would work well. Also, of course, there are some (slightly specious) ecological arguments that can be made about land-take and things (by growing it you don't have to do the wasteful thing of growing food which you feed to a cow which you then eat). Package it as eco-friendly animal-kind meat perhaps?
Still, it's very hard to predict what processes consumers will say "ewww factory" and what consumers will say "yum, natural".
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:52 pm (UTC)We will have to see who has the better advertisements and what we can get used to. I mean I bet the first person who tried to get someone interested in eating blue cheese had a pretty hard sell:
"So, you let the milk go really really off and added some kind of fungus."
"Sure."
"And you want me to help you clean it up and boil everything it's touched?"
"Not quite."
Also, perhaps it was just my friends group but "tofu" has been rehabilitated from "what the heck is this weird processed gloop" to "yummy all-natural tofu".
I wonder if, also, people like Heston Blumenthal who use "science" in food preparation can get people past the natural/unnatural idea? I mean there's no way someone can say an aerosol gel poached in liquid nitrogen is particularly "natural".
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:00 pm (UTC)And it's true... I can only eat blue cheese if I don't think about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:44 pm (UTC)So, I guess that since it's a "last 50 years" thing that people have expressed a preference there's a hope that the phenomenon will reverse and we'll lose the squeamishness. (Plus, there's a lot of hand-prepared food from, say, the victorian era that lots of people now would turn their noses up). So, who knows what will be acceptable and/or considered delicious in another 25-30 years. After all, the same type of people who go "natural or nothing" will often cram down all manner of ineffective or untested pills and potions from Holland and Barrett and the like because it's carefully marketted. Also, looking at recipe cards from the 1970s often makes people feel nauseous.
Incidentally "sausage making" is sometimes used as code around here for trying to get grant funding (in particular from the European Union). You want the sausage but you really really don't want to look at what goes into the sausage if you can help it.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:58 pm (UTC)And god, yes re: 70s recipe cards. I hope that there is a special circle of hell for whoever invented spam fritters.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:00 pm (UTC)Look at this collection of horror:
http://www.candyboots.com/wwcards/celerylog.html
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:11 pm (UTC)Even as a small child I was disgusted by spam fritters. That and the school mash, which was clearly nothing other than watery 'Smash'. (As every ex-student knows, the only way to make Smash palatable is to add half a block of Lurpak and huge quantities of ground pepper)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:23 pm (UTC)The only person known to have tasted in vitro meat was a Russian TV journalist who visited the lab last year. "He just grabbed it out of the dish and stuffed it into his mouth before I could say anything," said Post. The taste? "He said it was chewy and tasteless."