Opine at me, web ladies
Feb. 27th, 2011 05:24 pmGood afternoon, fiends!
I'm popping in for a blether while G succumbs to the rare manly pursuits of watching the football while eating fruit cake. (Actually he has been super-manly today because he also did some drilling so that I could change the handles on my bedside drawers for some lovely glass ones that had winged their way over from the People's Republic of China.)
Thank you for the replies to my poll yesterday. I'm delighted to see that "Ruprecht" is getting almost as many votes as the leading option! I have come to accept that, whatever his official name ends up being, he will always be Ruprecht to me. I've developed such a fond attachment to it that all other names now sound like strangers. (Last night we attended a family dinner for G's brother and received several new suggestions from nephews & neices, including Zebulon, Jesus and Timothy. Hmmm...)
On an unrelated matter, I've been noticing something about women who use the interwebz and wonder what you webby chapettes think. Do you think there is a 'type'? And if so, is there a whole nother type sitting quetly out there whose voices are not being heard online?
Being incurably plugged into the matrix, I am what you might call "active" on the webz. Admittedly a lot of my hangouts lean towards the thoroughly shallow, but at least two of them are big and mainstream. One of my fav haunts is www.ravelry.com, a social community for people who mess about with string. (Against all expectations, this site has won a ton of web awards and has become freakishly popular, with millions of members and never fewer than 3,000 logged in at any time.) Another - probably larger - community that I joined very recently is mumsnet (which again seems to have thousands logged in at any time).
The raison d'etre for both of these sites is to be a gathering place for people with one very specific thing on common - i.e. they are either string-fetishists or sproggers. Other than that, these places are free-for-alls which ought to represent the full politicial and social gamut. However, what I have started to notice in both camps is a dominant 'type' - this being ladies who are liberal/left wing, blunt, iconoclastic, tongue-in-cheek, irreverent, eloquent and a tad sweary. Humour tends to dominate most threads, and the rare voice that pops up to express something smacking of conservatism or easily-taken-offence tends to be drowned out pretty quickly by a combination of tutters, arguers and piss takers*. It's led me to wonder what it would look like if someone drew a Venn diagram of women who read the Daily Fail and women who are heavily active on internet forums. Would the two overlap at all? (And if so, where on earth are the Daily Fail readers all hanging out?)
Well I suppose that's enough witter from me. I think it's time to do a few lines...
Hope you're all having lovely, relaxing Sunday PMs. I wish it would not slip by so quickly....
* e.g. last week someone dared to complain about how offensive she finds "the C word" and asked if other mumsnetters would please stop using it so liberally - which has generated a huge thread dominated by love-your-vagina feminists and enthusiastic language geeks, extolling its worth and quoting Shakespeare, Chaucer and other etymological nerdery.
I'm popping in for a blether while G succumbs to the rare manly pursuits of watching the football while eating fruit cake. (Actually he has been super-manly today because he also did some drilling so that I could change the handles on my bedside drawers for some lovely glass ones that had winged their way over from the People's Republic of China.)
Thank you for the replies to my poll yesterday. I'm delighted to see that "Ruprecht" is getting almost as many votes as the leading option! I have come to accept that, whatever his official name ends up being, he will always be Ruprecht to me. I've developed such a fond attachment to it that all other names now sound like strangers. (Last night we attended a family dinner for G's brother and received several new suggestions from nephews & neices, including Zebulon, Jesus and Timothy. Hmmm...)
On an unrelated matter, I've been noticing something about women who use the interwebz and wonder what you webby chapettes think. Do you think there is a 'type'? And if so, is there a whole nother type sitting quetly out there whose voices are not being heard online?
Being incurably plugged into the matrix, I am what you might call "active" on the webz. Admittedly a lot of my hangouts lean towards the thoroughly shallow, but at least two of them are big and mainstream. One of my fav haunts is www.ravelry.com, a social community for people who mess about with string. (Against all expectations, this site has won a ton of web awards and has become freakishly popular, with millions of members and never fewer than 3,000 logged in at any time.) Another - probably larger - community that I joined very recently is mumsnet (which again seems to have thousands logged in at any time).
The raison d'etre for both of these sites is to be a gathering place for people with one very specific thing on common - i.e. they are either string-fetishists or sproggers. Other than that, these places are free-for-alls which ought to represent the full politicial and social gamut. However, what I have started to notice in both camps is a dominant 'type' - this being ladies who are liberal/left wing, blunt, iconoclastic, tongue-in-cheek, irreverent, eloquent and a tad sweary. Humour tends to dominate most threads, and the rare voice that pops up to express something smacking of conservatism or easily-taken-offence tends to be drowned out pretty quickly by a combination of tutters, arguers and piss takers*. It's led me to wonder what it would look like if someone drew a Venn diagram of women who read the Daily Fail and women who are heavily active on internet forums. Would the two overlap at all? (And if so, where on earth are the Daily Fail readers all hanging out?)
Well I suppose that's enough witter from me. I think it's time to do a few lines...
Hope you're all having lovely, relaxing Sunday PMs. I wish it would not slip by so quickly....
* e.g. last week someone dared to complain about how offensive she finds "the C word" and asked if other mumsnetters would please stop using it so liberally - which has generated a huge thread dominated by love-your-vagina feminists and enthusiastic language geeks, extolling its worth and quoting Shakespeare, Chaucer and other etymological nerdery.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:47 pm (UTC)Have to confess I have not checked out the Daily Fail message board. But surely people who read it must have other interests too.
If I remember rightly, the mail on sunday used to be full of alternative health and beauty supplements and similar woman-bait. (I wonder if Holland & Barrett have online forums, and if so - are the they plagued by a daily dose of outraged contributors?)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:59 pm (UTC)Plus my friend Richard often writes fake comments and I have to try and guess which one was his.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:47 pm (UTC)I've used the patterns section of ravelry but have yet to venture into the forum sections, and I do read the Daily Mail (for I have no shame and their showbiz pages are truly addictively brilliantly awful, I do occasionally click on the news stories but these invariably make me tut and occasionally shout)but I'd also like to think I fall into your description of liberal,irreverent and a tad sweary.
Think I'll do some lines after dinner as well.
Where does the name Zebulon come from? I kinda like it but in a Douglas Adams kind of way....though a quick look on the tinterweb reveals it was very popular in America in the 1700 and 1800's.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:48 pm (UTC)See, now you've said that, I think Ruprecht's middle name should be Zaphod.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:49 pm (UTC)G (the fountain of all wisdom on things OT) says that Zebulon was one of Joseph's brothers in Genesis.
Yay for doing lines!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 05:57 pm (UTC)I did about 20 lines in total yesterday evening and this morning - it's a bit difficult to get into a rhythm on it as each line is different and involves a bit of counting and me and counting aren't necessarily very good together.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:12 pm (UTC)Also Tim Rice...
Date: 2011-02-27 06:33 pm (UTC)Re: Also Tim Rice...
Date: 2011-02-27 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:15 pm (UTC)What were the theories on the origin of the word? I only know it must be Germanic/Scandinavian because post-1066 the English adopted all the French aristocratic titles, with the noticable absence of 'Comte' - which was replaced with 'Baron'.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:27 pm (UTC)(If rosamicula happens to read this, she might be good enough to pop in and give you a proper answer, as she has used this exact question as classroom teaching material!)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 10:01 pm (UTC)Before I ended up getting banned.